|
Business Benefits CASE STUDIES
"TAAM has become an extremely important
tool for the work we do in the public interest."
Andre J. Murphy, Senior Staff Member, MITRE CAASD.
The following case studies provide evidence of tangible outcomes
achieved by customers using TAAM:
DFS
The objective of this simulation was the optimization of the
extremely complex airspace structure and arrival-/departure
procedures for the approach control unit serving the three
airports of Berlin (Germany).
By using TAAM, DFS developed a new airspace sectorization
in combination with departure routes representing more optimal
flight profiles. This resulted in a reduction of the controllers'
coordination workload by almost 35%. At the same time airspace
users requirements were additionally met by considerably shorter
arrival routes, in line with optimized descent profiles. The
reduced fuel burn, improved safety, shorter flying time and
reduced airspace complexity, resulted in significant gains
for all stakeholders.
FEDEX
Construction work on one of FedEx's runways required a change
of operating procedures and forced the use of an alternate
runway. Numerous problems ensued. A TAAM simulation (the U27
project) demonstrated that a 30% delay reduction could be
achieved through the use of a new parking plan and departure
order.
Further TAAM simulations conducted in cooperation with Embry-Riddle
Aeronautical University (U3 project) resulted in another departure
plan. Estimated annual savings in fuel costs are about $5
million for the U27 project and close to $10 million for the
U3 project. Both projects won FedEx corporate Quality Awards
CONTINENTAL AIRLINES
On-Time Performance Improvements
By using TAAM, Continental was able to significantly reduce
delays and improve on-time performance at its Newark and Cleveland
hubs. In Cleveland, departure peak optimization helped to
reach more than 90% on-time performance target without any
sacrifices to the summer schedule integrity.
DELTA
Two possible expansion alternatives at Delta's major hub airport
were studied, one being significantly larger than the other.
The analysis concluded that the costlier alternative to alleviate
airport congestion, which occurred only ten percent of the
year, created more delay than the less ambitious expansion
plan. This operational insight then helped airport planners
reject an alternative that would have cost considerably more
to construct, without any additional operational benefits.
|